Hawaii Law TV® is part of the Law TV® Network, a video driven legal directory that features quality educational videos from some of the state’s premier law firms.
The legal directory includes a comprehensive listing for each law firm, including how to reach the firm directly or on social media.
The complaint alleges the defendants are intentionally infringing on Subway's trademarks and operating their Sub Sub restaurant using Subway's...
Continue Reading
U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs of the District of Massachusetts entered a default judgment in favor of Jumpsource, partially granting their...
Continue Reading
Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote in January that Tesla CEO Elon Musk "wields unusually expansive managerial...
Continue Reading
Cozen O'Connor is moving into Little Rock with the hire of a former Arkansas attorney general, while Faegre Drinker's hire arrives from Troutman...
Continue Reading
"This new clemency initiative is a cornerstone of our administration's efforts to make New Jersey the state of second chances," Gov. Phil Murphy said...
Continue Reading
Amazon cited a growing trend among attorneys to corner niche markets by suing specific corporations by gleaning inside knowledge through expansive...
Continue Reading
“I know I missed many excellent applicants,” wrote David Tatel, who served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Related Stories’Indefensible & Inexcusable’: Ex-Judge Luttig on Role of Lawyers in Lead Up to Jan. 6 – EnclosureJudges in the Hot Seat Over Oral Argument Diversity Policies – Enclosure’Watershed Moment’: Female […]
On Thursday, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation heard arguments on whether to combine about two dozen lawsuits alleging children and young adults got addicted to video games.
Trump, 77, was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records. Prosecutors persuaded the jury that he conspired with others to “catch and kill” negative stories about himself during the 2016 presidential election cycle, thereby unlawfully influencing the election.
The trial court ruled it was barred by “act of state doctrine,” which, prohibits American courts from sitting in judgment on the acts of another government acting within its own territory.